Hosea 7:7
All of them are hot like an oven,
And they consume their rulers;
All their kings have fallen.
None of them calls on Me.

The King of Pop is dead. The problem is that he didn’t die with that title still in his hands, & the implications of this for pop music are more astounding than most are willing to admit. Because we live in a snobbish culture of The Outsider, & mine is the generation of the outcast forlorn soul; we all want to like what no one else likes, or in ways that none can appreciate, & so much of our artistic output reflects that wonderfully (or perhaps unfortunately). The only issue is that mine is also the generation of blanket preferences – the inhuman tendency to accept or reject an entire viewpoint or packaged product without careful examination of its complexities. This combination of hip elitism & uninformed taste is an ultimately dangerous one, & the fact that the King of Pop’s death does not signify the death of Pop itself should be a wake-up call.
Because this isn’t about Michael Jackson, in the end. If anything, it’s about Justin Timberlake, the somewhat unofficial new King of Pop; the crown was controversially turned over to JT with the release of his Futuresex/Love Sounds album a few years back, & it was a move that he accepted with relative pomp, as any good king would. The change was only logical: Michael hadn’t released a competent album in more than ten years, & the ex-boyband dreamboat had all the necessary voice, moves, & sexual songwriting prowess (the latter much more so than his predecessor, but that’s to be expected; we are, after all, living in the soon to be outdated age of internet porn & Pam Anderson). Such is music, though: time passes, artists fade, & legacies are maintained. No one would argue Thriller, Bad, & even most of Dangerous were not phenomenal pop albums (for sheer grandeur if nothing else), & so this post, really, isn’t even about history.

What I’m hoping to get across here is that pop is not just something to be appreciated by the culturally “high class” in hindsight. It is living now in much the same way it has lived in the past &, just the same as pop has always been, there is the good, the bad, & most certainly the ugly. Pardon the cliché, but my point is that the way most music listeners approach the radio is two-fold & usually two-dimensional: they either refuse to even turn it on (unless it’s AM or NPR, which I have no problem with but should in no way be the end-all; the way I see it, talk radio is cultured only in that it is one small piece of a huge cultural tapestry. To neglect the rest of your radio is to plug your ears & say “na na na” when an adult is speaking to you; it is, ultimately, rather childish), OR they refuse to listen to anything else. Just like every other aspect of day-to-day life, whether it be politics, film, food, or the opposite sex, there are complications to pop music for worse & definitely for better.
I want to offer first off that everyone should at some point take time in their lives to work in an office in which a pop music radio station is playing all day long, every day. If nothing else, you begin to find sweet harmony in its regularity, a rhythm to when songs are played & why. I have no experience in communications, & don’t know anything of the science of broadcasting, but it’s no secret that the DJs aren’t just popping in CDs & going on break. They have a purpose, & there is obviously some reason certain songs are played at certain intervals. I would also recommend this exposure to radio as a way to find out what you like & don’t like as an alternative to simply embracing or tossing all of it aside. Just like your favorite kind of music, there are songs that are good, songs that are bad, & clearly (CLEARLY) artists that are doing the whole thing right.
The magic of the pop song, then – or perhaps I should say one of the magic tricks – is in its structure, & more specifically in the way the really golden tracks stand out by building on themselves like a novel. For the best example of this, & because I’ve really wanted to write about this song for awhile, look at the reigning Princess of Pop, Taylor Swift’s “Love Story”:

The story is familiar, & Shakespearan, and the use of the names Romeo & Juliet is rather genius: why try to hide what you’re saying? It’s clearly the age-old story of forlorn lovers (only with a happier ending, duh), & to romanticize it as anything else would be nothing but a false step. The structure, though, is the most complex piece of this pop puzzle, due in large part to its dual-narration technique headed by a female voice speaking both as narrator & girlish lead. There is a story being laid out through conversation & conflict, & this makes it easy to signify as country music & shed it of artistic merit. This, perhaps, is warranted, but my point is that artistic merit is fruitless & the rules have to change when considering pop. Taste is not an art, & shouldn’t be.
The song, however, is the issue here. Because “Love Story” builds like no other song of this year, & when the climax comes it almost feels like stepping outside after one of these Virginia evening storms. There is resolution, grinning, & general, triumphant ease. This is a song about emotions, about getting what you’ve fought for, & no one struggles for this kind of answer more than an 18 year old girl. This, after all, is what Taylor Swift is, & it’s exactly the lens through which we should be listening to her music. I was lukewarm to her voice coming through the airwaves until this song began playing 8-9 times a day (or maybe more!), & it clicked. Hers is a song I can feel in the gut, & that should be okay. That should be enough.
I don’t want to belabor my point as I’ve been apt to do in the past, but the radio is full of this stuff, it practically pours like hot lava out of the speakers. Look at David Cook’s “Light On” (the chorus of which is a fist-pumper like you wouldn’t believe) & “Come Back To Me” – both songs with stories, pleading, & climactic peaks pop music has been searching for ever since “My Heart Will Go On” (this is an exaggeration, of course, it is perhaps impossible to touch the climactic absurdity of that song). Maybe I don’t even need to mention Miley Cyrus‘ latest – “The Climb” – which is the first single of hers I’ve actually grown to like; it is her most adult matter, certainly, though the vague topical nature falls a little flat. I don’t suppose that that’s the point though; if you aren’t moved, the song wasn’t written for you, & you can be certain there is one somewhere that was.
On that note, I still don’t like any song Kanye has come up with since “Jesus Walks,” & he is THE prime example of the elite music culture latching on to one pop artist to laud forever, through thick & thin, just to prove they they “like pop music” (see also Jay-Z & even Kelly Clarkson, if you can believe it. Clarkson, by the way, has just released her two best pop singles, & they sound very little like what she’s been releasing for the past five years. This shouldn’t necessarily be a surprise). The best song on the radio right now, to absolutely no one’s shock, is Beyoncé’s “Halo.” That girl, I swear, can do no wrong, & time will only tell how long she can keep it up.
There is, of course, a lot of crap on the radio: the softly-hard rock bands like Shinedown & Nickelback who muddle their production so badly you can’t tell a guitar from a high hat from a vocal line (not to mention their cummings-ian way of smushing words together to make band names), the falsetto soft-rockers with a similar production issue & very little in the creative writing department (see The Fray, O.A.R.), & the faux-punk knockoffs who traded their attitude for skinny jeans & knit caps. For the most part, these are the ones who take themselves too seriously for pop music, & not seriously enough for the art of elevated musical stylings; they are the middlings, & they give pop radio a bad rap.
I think while writing this all out finally, I’m coming to the conclusion that the radio can be frustrating because it doesn’t have a Skip Track button. If someone doesn’t like the song, they assume it’s all this bad & reject it outright. One trick is to find a smattering of stations you like, all with different styles of music. Program your car radio with a button for pop, one for bluegrass, one for NPR, classic rock, Motown, whatever. The point is to come to an understanding that pop music is as complex as anything else, & though it might not be compared to the complexities of abortion or the Iranian election, perhaps it should be. This is your daily enjoyment & cultural awareness we’re talking about, & if anything is important in living a well-rounded life, it just may be the knowledge of what’s happening around you.
Michael Jackson is dead, but what he lived for did not die with him. Pop is the lynchpin of our musical culture, & its importance as tasteful litmus test cannot be overstated. Now if you’ll excuse me, Taylor Swift’s new song is on & I don’t wanna miss this one.
The Taylor Swift Love Story song is a favorite of my 9 year old kid right now (along with Fearless), and even though I think there is too much Nashville style composition on the radio right now, I encouraged her to listen to it over the Miley Cyrus crap (sorry, not elitist, but it is really unlistenable).
You’ve hit on the core of that song — besides having a vocal which has a from the lungs power that many teendivas are lacking, the core of Swift lies in really in the composition. Since I make my daughter look up the writers of her favorite songs, I’m blessed with the knowledge that Taylor Swift actually wrote the song, which is really uncommon these days. I also know that she composed the song in the method I favor myself — by starting out with a fragment of melody and lyrics, and slowly working out what the story surrounding it was — in her case it was the line “This love is difficult, but it’s real” — which is actually the core theme of the song, and what gives it it’s resonance.
Yet that line, which is really the crux of the argument of the song, doesn’t appear until right before the bridge. And actually the progression there is really interesting too — there are ways in which the use of verb tenses remind me a bit of some of Tom Waits stuff:
The tenses there make that a scene more than a narrative. Like most art, you can tell it’s good, because if you rewrite it it loses something:
It’s a minor thing, it’s still a strong segment without the tense shift, but there’s so many little things like that in this song. I actually learned to play the song on request of my daughter, it’s a relatively common chord progression, but the interaction of the melody with the chords really creates this sense of inexorable build.
I’ll tell you what — give me a CD of Taylor Swift and one of Devendra Banhart and a long car ride, it’s likely I’d go with the Taylor Swift.
There I said that, on record.
I also think the Lily Allen stuff is quite good, although she’s not writing it per se.
This is funny cos I was strongly considering writing a whole ‘nother beast of a post on this specific song alone. It’s a rarity in pop form for a myriad of reasons, the best of which you touched on very eloquently here. You’re right about the structure-as-scene tools that are being employed throughout, & it was a point I was floundering to get across in my post. Not only is it a feat to write your own #1 hit in today’s pop radio world – & especially for a 19 year old popstress to do so – but to write one that is so convincingly self-conscious & masterfully structured…I don’t think the usual music fan gives those who can pull it off nearly enough credit. Part of what I was trying to say here was that pop stars like Prince, MJ, whomever, are all given hearty praise merely in hindsight – their songs are popular in their own time, but looked down on by “serious” music critics with “real” ideas until years later. Why do we only care about Purple Rain as an artistic piece when it’s released as a double-disc 20th anniversary gold disc edition? It’s immature & silly.
This is where I think a song like “Love Story” should be recognized in its time & with the language we usually reserve merely for hindsight. Its form is shamelessly framed by the structures of a well written suspense tale, its little nuances coming at perfect times to accent its meaning & climax with an impeccable sense of what it means to tease a listener (one of the finer moments of the song is the little “Huh, huh” just before the second chorus kicks in; it’s the sound of expectation, excitement, & young desire). And as a more taste-oriented point, I agree with you that the girl has a fantastic set of pipes for what she’s pulling off – that slight pop-country twang is inevitable but hardly noticeable except as an after thought, & her range is meant to pull just the right emotions out of the listener rather than just show-off (something that Mariah Carey, for example, had in her hey-day, but lost quickly with time).
As a last note, I’ve heard the name Lily Allen, but I’m not sure who she is or what she sings?…
Well, the big one is “The Fear”, which was written supposedly by Allen and a guy named Greg Kurstin — but when I see a 20 year old singer “co-writing” with a 40 year old songwriter I usually discount it.It’s not on the level of Love Story, but it reminds me of some of the better pop from the 80s:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-wGMlSuX_c